The Fat, the Frail, and the Faithful

28 November 2021

Any three non-exclusive descriptions can easily be expressed as a Venn Diagram, with singular lobes all around, intersections between, and all at the center.

It has been clear to many, long before the advent of Wuhan Flu™ (“hallowed be its name”), that the fat and the frail are much more susceptible to respiratory distress than the rest of us.  Influenzae, Coronae, and Rhino viruses have been killing the elderly and the sick and the obese in much greater proportions than everybody else for centuries.  “Virus gonna virus” means that new strains will claim new victims. As they mutate, they’ll become more transmissible and less lethal.  Otherwise, they would extinguish themselves, which is a poor business model for any predator.

People generally know their own interests best, so I’m disinclined to confront them over their personal precautions.  Even if I doubt their motives or reasoning, we should still be able to peacefully coexist.  If a private merchant insists that I muzzle up before entering his shop, I will either comply (if I want what’s inside enough), or I will move on.  When a privileged insider who remains open while his smaller competitors are padlocked by the state makes the same “request” I am less sympathetic.  I have to both breathe AND eat, so I will cheerfully endure the stink-eye and hectoring as I shop.  If ChowMart™ or JohnBoy’s™ want to throw me out, they’re going to have to tell me personally, or maybe even threaten me with violence.  Again, I have to eat.  But that’s just me.  You do you all you want. 

For me, a face mask outside of the ICU or surgical theatre makes as much sense as casual swimwear.  They are often just sectarian vestments, so I’d rather not. And if I can get away with it, I won’t.  But sometimes the penalties for non-compliance are too dire, so I’ll wear pants at some beaches, and masks in some shops or homes.

I am less sanguine about the sacraments and sacrifices of this new faith.  I’ll pass on the alleged “vaccines” partly for the same reason that my old chum stays away from LSD or Quaaludes while still enjoying weed or booze.  Some things have passed the tests of generations, and some things are a little too new for our comfort levels.  I am horrified by the gerontocratic insistence that babies and toddlers be jabbed or muzzled for the sake of their grandparents.  If Granny is in precarious enough shape, then we’ll cheerfully muzzle up in her presence.  We love her.  Otherwise, we’re going to play in the sun and the dirt, just as we have for millennia.  Children (other than the fat and the frail) are generally the most durable of us, so subjecting them to dangerous experimental injections constitutes child sacrifice.  Moloch seems to be back with a vengeance.  Maybe it’s time to crush Canaan again.  Paging Joshua…

update 211201 — Cultish Comparisons
I’ll clarify for the eagerly aggrieved. Some people have very good reasons for masking up or accepting an injection that mitigates their risk. Their behavior may be neither cultish nor irrational, but prudently cautious. I would not presume to know their motives, so I’m satisfied to let them be.
Some other people who decline these precautions are much too eager to presume motives of sheepish compliance and to excoriate those whom they consider to be “Branch Covidians.” I wish they wouldn’t. First, because we’re not living each others’ lives so, in general, we should not infer reasons for face masks or yarmulkas or Mardi Gras beads. As Mr Jefferson reminds me, if “it neither breaks my leg nor picks my pocket” it’s probably none of my business. Second, and specifically, the late Branch Davidians were the victims of state violence, whereas the most egregious of the pushy Maskerati and Jabolins are the proponents of state violence.

Biograph

12 March 2002

Hi!  Excuse me!  Can I bug ya a minute? … is how I approach prospective petitioners as I solicit signatures.  And while that may not be the way a life begins, it is how each campaign begins.
Hi!  … is a friendly greeting.  It says, “I’m not sneaking up on you.” 
It gives you a chance to size me up.
Excuse me!  … is an acknowledgment that I’m interrupting you. 
I know that I’m using up your time.
Can I bug ya a minute?  … means that I have more to say so if you need to blow me off, now would be a good time.

After that, I’ve gotten someone’s attention without getting them out of the bath or rousing them from a nap.  In fact, it usually doesn’t take as long as a minute to actually sign a petition.  I don’t knock on strangers’ houses, I walk the residential areas of the district and engage pedestrians and weekend gardeners and skateboarders and people out walking the dog.  They’re up.  They’re alert.  They’re approachable. 

I will not knock on someone’s door unless, a) it’s an emergency, b) I have an appointment, or c), it is the home of friends who more or less expect me, and are usually glad to see me.  Other than that, NO WAY. People should respect your privacy.  The Congress should respect your privacy, the State Legislature should respect your privacy, and first of all, politicians should respect your privacy.  If a candidate shows so little regard for your rights while he’s begging for your support, how much will he respect them when he’s in office?

Earlier…  A little background, usually in order about here…
Our family has lived on the Island of Hawaii since 1997.  We moved here from the Oregon Coast.  Previously I have lived (as a Navy Brat) in Oregon, on Oahu (1969-1971), and in New England and Washington State.  My cumulative kama’aina tenure would now be about seven years.

I guess I was born a libertarian, but I didn’t know the word until adolescence.  I developed an interest in politics at a fairly early age.  My parents were split over Kennedy/Nixon, and my mother showed a great fondness for Barry Goldwater, so by the time I was 12 years old, and Nixon and Humphrey were the anointed, I was “Clean with Gene” (McCarthy.)  It’s just as well that 16 year olds couldn’t vote in 1972, because at the time I believed that George McGovern was going to rescue America from the viper Nixon.  I’ve since come to recant that position a bit, looking upon Richard Nixon as something of an unintentional national hero.  His worse than useless price freeze of the previous year was the final straw that led to the founding of the Libertarian Party, and his presidency in general has done more to inspire distrust in government than just about any other figure in recent history.  Sadly, that lesson seems not to have stuck.

In 1975 I met Early Riser, and in 1976 we were wed.  She has since blessed me with two fine sons.  Stargazer is presently an Astronomy major at UH in Hilo, and The Enumerator is pursuing his Masters’ Degree in Mathematics at Oregon State University.

Later, in 1976, I found myself a Jerry Brown Republican, arguing that America should return to the Gold Standard… and the Moon.  I’m still working on both counts.  During the same summer I’d read William F. Buckley’s “Up from Liberalism and re-read Abbie Hoffman’s “Revolution for the Hell of It.”  The two taken together set up a wicked turbulence in my mind that left me well poised for an epiphany.  Working security at the Ketchikan Spruce Mill one long Alaskan summer night I ran across some literature from the Roger MacBride campaign, and first saw the word “libertarian” spelled with a capital letter and in some other context than “civil.”  I read it, read it again, and all that night read it over and over.  Amazing!  Here was an organized group of people who seemed to believe as I did, that governments are instituted among men, and that they derive their JUST powers from the consent of the governed, and that the government that governs best governs least, and every other battle cry of freedom that I could recall from my twenty years of life.

That was twenty-six years ago this summer, and I haven’t looked back.  But I did go on.  I spent four years in the Air Force, served as a Jet Mechanic for the Strategic Air Command and for the Pacific Air Forces, and was honorably discharged in 1981 with four stripes, a wife, and two sons.  We returned to Corn Valley to cash in my GI Bill where I studied Physics and Mechanical Engineering at Beaver Tech.

In addition to my formal course work at the University I began pursuing my political education in earnest, attending meeting Sugar and Bud.  For the past twenty years they have remained trusted advisors and harsh critics.  I made my first run for the House in 1982 as an otherwise unemployed full-time student.  The party in Oregon didn’t manage to secure ballot status that year, so we had to run write-in.  I’m pretty sure we cracked double digits on that one.

In 1986 I was graduated from OSU with a pair of degrees and a fair amount of debt.  I worked where I could and let politics take a back seat to my other interests.  During this time Busy Body and I drifted from each other, gradually pushing each other away.  Eventually we stayed pushed.  In 1988, while playing Sherlock Holmes in a local amateur theatre production, I met Diva Dearest, who was working as a sound technician in the show.  We resonated both on a political and moral level, but, more important, we laughed a lot together.  We were married in 1989, and in 1991, our daughter, L’Historienne was born.  She is named after the cyber-hero of Robert Heinlein’s “The Moon is a Harsh Mistress,” Supergirl (in the original Kryptonian), the woman who was responsible for coaxing Drama Queen to work on the show that brought us together, and the great villain from Doc Smith’s “Skylark series – science fiction principles run strong through this family.   

By the time the political itch got strong enough to throw me back in to the fray, it was 1996.  This time the Oregon party was on the ballot, and so we did much better, receiving, for myself at least, just under 2%.

Neither disappointed nor discouraged, having witnessed a progression of going from “Liber-what?” to actually being recognized, printed in the newspaper, and acknowledged on the air, I was not to be denied.  I would run every chance I got.  Politics, and campaigning, I had learned, was just too much fun and too satisfying to ever sit it out again.  As steep as the odds appear, not trying is not acceptable.

Big talk, but life intervenes…  In December of 1996, just six weeks after the election that had so fired my enthusiasm, facing another grim wet Oregon Coast winter that was taking its toll on Drama Queen’s health, and listening to Bing Crosby singing Mele Kalikimaka on the stereo, we realized that you can be broke and in debt anywhere in America.  We’d always wanted to move to the tropics (or at least vacation.)  I had lived on Oahu as a boy when the Navy had stationed my step-father at Pearl, and the Air force had sent me to Okinawa for part of my tour.  I knew I was suited to the year-round barefoot scene.  My mother had since moved there after her retirement and had been coaxing us to visit for some time.  It took Bing, ultimately, to give us that final push.

We worked.  We saved.  I did double shifts. We had a huge garage sale.  We packed up, tossed out, and mailed off – a box at a time.  And when we stepped off the plane in Kona of August of 1997 we knew we’d made it home.  Within a year we’d purchased a house – a house mind you, a house in paradise.  No other place on Earth has been as good for us as the Big Island.

In 1998 Noreen Chun ran for the Congress as a Libertarian, leaving me off the hook.  Besides, bettah one local girl run than some pretentious malihini.  In 2000, Noreen elected not to run again, and I felt it was again time for me to step forward.

Third party candidates (unless they are gainfully retired) are still obliged to earn a living.  So, while working as an Audit Clerk at the Hilton Waikoloa Village (in whose employ I remain) I chanced to meet Wayne Ryker.  Here was another who was fond of an intellectual challenge and could see clearly to the center of an issue.  While working together we often argued politics.  I made no secret of my aspirations, and he made no secret of his doubts.  He, too, has become a trusted advisor and a harsh critic.  (I need them all.)  It was through him that I met our wondrous web spinner, Rhonni Samplas, whose gracious generosity and titanic talents have permitted me to inflict my clumsy prose on the suffering surfing audience.

We did respectably for a party that no one had heard of a generation ago, and for a candidate who was new to the area and still pushing down roots.  For the record, based on vote totals in partisan races in Hawaii, I was the most popular Libertarian of the season.  Polling only half the state and winning roughly 2.4% of the vote, I beat our party’s Presidential and Senate candidates, both running statewide, and in raw numbers (4468) every other independent party candidate in the state with the exception of Ralph Nader (whose “independent” credentials are questionable.)  I hope we can build on that.  With your help, and the valuable support of my extended political family (see below), we will.

Hawaii’s greatest burdens are crushing taxes, suffocating regulations, and the inflexible labor laws.  Hawaii is rich in resources and opportunities, but it goes nowhere if people are unwilling to invest their money, their sweat, or their dreams.  A business-friendly Hawaii, freed of artificial restraints, could become a real workers’ paradise – the Hong Kong of the Pacific.

I will bring to the Congress an understanding of the limits of federal authority.  These limitations are spelled out in the Constitution in concise English, and are clear to any reasonably educated person (with the obvious exception of judges, lawyers, Democrats, and Republicans.)  I promise neither pork nor special favors, but freedom and opportunity for all.

Make America Greigh Anon is…
Policy & Oratory:  Gene Greigh
Public Affairs:  Diva Dearest
Policy Analysts:  Wayne Ryker, Sugar, Bud
Inspiration:  L’Historienne, The Enumerator, Stargazer
Wicked Web Craft:  Rhonni Samplas

update 211110:  As noted elsewhere, this election also did not work out as well as I’d hoped, but I did manage to survive.  What did not survive includes my marriage to Diva Dearest, Diva Dearest herself and Wayne Ryker (both now deceased), my Hawaiian residency, regular contact with Rhonni Samplas, and the close confidences of Sugar and Bud. L’Historienne, The Enumerator, and Stargazer have all since taken their respective degrees, and they and Stargazer’s offspring remain consoling joys, even if my contact with them all is distant, fleeting, and intermittent.

“My bad” way doesn’t cut it!

11 January 2018

If the matter is minor (getting jostled in a crowd), you might offer it as you would “oops” or “excuse me.” But be advised. “My bad” is not an apology.

Let’s put things in their proper camps. We excuse an error. We forgive an offense. Everybody makes mistakes, but as long as no obvious patterns emerge there’s no call for anyone to be taking any offense. Offenses are more personal, and we infer clear intent or egregious neglect if we’re taking offense. An offense calls for a more elaborate response.

A proper apology consists of four parts. You may call them the 4 Cs.
Confession: I did it. It was me. That’s my fault.
Commiseration: That stinks. How awful this is. I am so sorry.
Comprehension: I know what I did. I understand how that hurts.
Commitment: I’ll do better. I’ll try harder. I’ll be more attentive.

“My bad” or “Mea culpa” (Latin for “my bad“), both being possessive and acknowledging culpability, almost satisfy the first two criteria. However, they offer nothing to the other criteria, and aren’t even full sentences. Not “my bad” anyway. English calls for subjects and verbs, my and bad are both adjectives. I don’t know from foreign grammar, so “Mea culpa” might be an actual sentence. And it’s Latin, so extra points for falutin’ so highly! Still, it’s only halfway there. Assign it also to the Synonyms for “Oops” Column.

In addition to lacking much of the essence of an apology, its very brevity aggravates the offense. It suggests that it is a trivial matter, unworthy of basic courtesy. It’s the rhetorical equivalent of “It’s nothing, move on.”

It’s worse than no apology at all.

Positive Feedback

19 May 2019

In Mechanical and Electrical Engineering (and probably other disciplines as well), a positive feedback loop can be disastrous.  For reference, see “Galloping Gert” and “Marching in Step” or just listen to the amp’s complaints when the microphone gets too close to the speaker. 

With public policy, the principle remains the same, but because the damage is distributed throughout the body politic, the catastrophe is harder to discern, but it is just as disastrous.  Witness the effects of prohibition, as it engenders increasing destruction:

Step 1:  Prohibit the possession, production, or importation of “X.”

Step 2:  Witness the free (“black”) market response to prohibition as resourceful entrepreneurs develop means to satisfy the surviving demand for “X” and the violence that emerges to protect the subsidized profits for providing “X.”

Step 3:  Point to the free (“black”) market and the emergent violence that accompanies its illegality as evidence of the inherent criminality of “X.”

Step 4:  Return to Step 1 but enhance the prohibition with additional sanctions.

Saturday Night Live’s skit about “Ex-Police” perfectly illustrates this loop: “Another marihuana-related death,” said the home invader (Dan Aykroyd) after he pummeled the hapless pothead (John Belushi) into paste.

Sic Semper Shalom

5 November 2021

As an American atheist, the “Sharia Laws” with which I am most familiar (no wine or hard liquor to be sold on Sundays or fines for public nudity or prison for sodomites, for example) are mostly of the Judeo-Christian variety.  I am less concerned with Buddhist or Hindu or Muslim silliness, but because these faiths also energize literally billions, I take pains to familiarize myself with their mythology.  To that effect, I have been reading The Quran lately.  As literature, it doesn’t compare well with its competitors.  Ye Olde Testament and Edith Hamilton’s Greek Mythology are still tied for the best stories, but The New Improved Testament and The New World Testament are not far behind.  The Quran and The Bhagavad Gita are both very dry and tedious, but nevertheless interesting.  

But The Quran has its unique charms.  I get the impression that it was inspired (contrary to the pedophile Mohammed’s claim) because Leviticus just wasn’t harsh enough.  Chapter 8, verses 14 & 50 both prescribe death by fire for unbelievers, while chapter 9, verse 17 reiterates that we will be in the fire forever.  Like the other texts, it is not always explicit, so some Imams will interpret that as prescriptive – put them to death with fire – whereas others claim that it is merely predictive – they will burn in Hell (“What an evil destination.”)  Nevertheless, it is a gruesome and cruel notion, difficult to reconcile with the claim that “Islam is a religion of peace.”

Or maybe not so difficult.  After all, Joe Gill’s and Pat Boyette’s creation, The Peacemaker (now being portrayed on the screen by commie tool John Cena), was so committed to peace that he was “willing to FIGHT for it.”  And the motto of the Strategic Air Command, as I was reminded every morning when I reported to the Jet Shop, was “Peace is our Profession.”  Upon reflection, I guess it’s not such a stretch.  What’s more peaceful than a corpse?

Dumping on Digits?

1 November 2021

The most popular and well known of an emerging class of “crypto-currencies,” BitCoin™ is a digital product without physical backing or central controlling authority beyond the parameters of its internal definition. It has been described as a “peer-to-peer” record of solutions to mathematical puzzles known as a “blockchain.”

It has been decried by its detractors as the ultimate fiat, insofar as it has no material backing, and lauded as the savior of civilization as a currency which cannot be inflated without limit, nor controlled by any bureaucracy. Like metals, crypto satisfies many of the necessary criteria of a serviceable currency — it is scarce, it is readily recognizable (to those familiar with it), it is easily divisible, and it is fungible. Even if it neither clinks like metals nor rustles like paper. And it seems to be dependent on modern tech to be recognized and manipulated, but that’s a small problem, as long as the ‘net stays up and electrons continue to race around circuitry.

But metals’ greatest fans remain leery of it, or of it’s smaller subdivision the Satoshi, while many of its boosters earnestly defend it against the criticisms of “goldbugs” and other obsolescent old relics like your genial host.

correspondent TC is particularly passionate, stating that “Relying on metals in the age of the internet is stupid. [Peter] Schiffian goldbugs are cultists worse than the covidiots.” Which invites the question, how am I “worse than the covidiots?” Was it my effort to destroy the economy, murder the elderly, or abuse children? Or simply to squirrel away some secure savings that would survive both regime changes AND power outages? So many crimes. Which did he catch me committing?

correspondent TC responds: “Its [sic] your intransigence in simultaneously raising gold to a holy status while denigrating crypto as funny money. Your comment about a power outage already tells me you don’t know anything about it.  Besides if we’re preparing for the end of the world, I have a box of bullets that’s worth more than all the gold in your safe.  People like Schiff have just raised the deception to an art form. The comparison to the ‘covidiots’ is the unwillingness to learn, grow, apply logic and reason.

I appreciate TC‘s refining his definition of my allegedly “covidiotic” misbehavior or misapprehension, but he still raises more questions than he answers, as he goes on to advise me to “[d]o whatever you want with your wealth, just stop trying to tell me crypto is bullshit and gold is magic. They are at best on equal footing, and that’s being generous.”

TC seems to have mistaken my curiosity for an inability to compromise or to learn (“intransigence”), as well as inferring a mysticism (conferring a “holy status” onto the profane) that is antithetical to empiricism. In order for me to “stop” telling him that “crypto is bullshit and gold is magic” I would have to first START. Someone seems to have tapped a well of hostility within him, and he’s vomited it all over me. But I have a generous heart and am willing to leave such emotionalism behind.
Nevertheless, in the spirit of “transigence” I’m eager to learn new things, and generally grateful for correction. So I posed this question to him: Lacking electrical power (including batteries or photoelectric transformers), please explain how I might purchase or spend a Satoshi or two. Can a verifiable “block-chain” be expressed manually? I (mis?)understand that all digital products are ultimately sequences or matrices of ‘nits and noughts. Finally, I advised TC to be wary of assuming that I have (or anyone else has) neglected ANY of the four metals of freedom: gold, silver, copper, AND LEAD!

correspondent TC has so far declined to respond.

correspondent Otmia Unogsy, meanwhile, points out that “crypto currencies DO have a physical backing. The devices you use, mining equipment, computers. All essential physical things in an internet age.” By the same token, of course, F’eral Reserve “Dollars” also have a similar “physical backing.” Their value is supported by the “full faith and credit” of the united States’ military reputation, and their demonstrated ability to obliterate would-be competitors to petro-dollar hegemony. The important difference between “support” and “backing” is convertibility. Remove the support, and the value evaporates, whereas gold and silver retain their value irrespective of the fate of the backing authority. I have silver and gold coins that were issued by extinct governments, and they are still just as valuable as equivalent lumps of metal.

correspondent LR-L offers a few kind words, and adds that he is “a ‘diversify’ guy” himself “with an admitted bias toward the post-collapse value of boxes of lead denominated in grains per unit.” He concludes from my thoughts, and from the various responses that I provoked, that there exists a “need to do a Kickstarter for the Well of Hostility®, although what form that should take is proving a stubborn idea.” 

Being an Ego Supremacist

27 July 2020

I have probably always been a Gene Supremacist, thinking that, in general, my opinion was more clear or coherent than any other.  Nevertheless, I readily acknowledge the vastness of my ignorance and welcome counsel. 

Conflation has never seduced me.  I recognized early on the great diversity around me, so bigotry was never an attraction.  I do recollect accepting the opinions of my family at an early age, but when I realized how irrational their racism was, I decided that I knew better.

Accusations of “white supremacy” are offensive on many levels, mainly as an insult to one’s intelligence.  Because I speak English, and I’ve seen a box of crayons, I know that there are no white or black people on Earth.  I am not unaware of popular fictions, but I maintain firmer standards.  If it’s untrue and it isn’t poetic or funny, it’s a lie.  And even if it is poetic, it might still be a lie (see Gettysburg Address).  On the other hand, as I diverge again, “negro” is fun, even as it literally means “black.”   Still, it’s a nice word; it’s warm and friendly.  Think of the muscles of your face as you pronounce it.  It starts with a smile and ends up in a look of astonishment and delight.  “Nigger” on the other hand, is just mean.  It starts with a sneer and ends with a growl.

The idea that “white supremacy” has any serious traction in a world where the observation that “There sure are a lot of Jewish Nobel Laureates, aren’t there?  And a lot of tall negros in the NBA!” can get you scorned, scolded, and verbally scalded, is ridiculous.  Many have lost jobs and other opportunities over less.  There are no visible rewards for “white supremacist” behavior, so the notion that it has any practical currency in running the world is utterly absurd. 

YES IT DID!  IT WAS THE WAVE OF THE PAST! 
And the LAW, thanks to Jim Crow Democrats. 
But for the most part, the past is past.

But nothing attracts a warrior like an unwinnable war.  In the fight for equality, no victory is possible because differences are what enrich our lives.  But the fight goes on, and as racial relations improve, the rhetoric is ramped up.  As enemies fade into the mist, the definition must be expanded to advance the front.  As I’d indicated elsewhere, “objective, rational linear thinking” and the recognition of causality and quantitative differences are not so much the hallmarks of civilization and hygiene and health and prosperity, but characteristics of “whiteness” or “white supremacy.”